Author Archives: mmontaner

Stop the Violence BC endorses the Sensible BC campaign

Posted on by

Stop the Violence BC has long argued that decriminalization is an insufficient policy response when it comes to addressing the range of public health and safety concerns associated with cannabis prohibition. That said, it is the position of the Stop the Violence BC steering committee that decriminalization stands to minimize a variety of pressing social and economic concerns.*

The legislation tabled by Sensible BC (described below) is designed as a first step towards taxation and regulation of cannabis for recreational use by adults and it is on that basis that Stop the Violence BC is pleased to endorse their campaign.

Stop the Violence BC encourages all of our supporters to consider working with the Sensible BC team to help people understand that the campaign does have a mechanism through which it is pushing for taxation and regulation and that decriminalization is just the first step.

For more information about Sensible BC or to participate in their campaign for a marijuana referendum, please visit www.sensiblebc.ca.

*PLEASE NOTE: Stop the Violence BC’s endorsement may not reflect the personal views of all our coalition members.

[hr]

The following summary is taken from the Sensible BC website. To review the entire legislation, please click here.

PART ONE: Decriminalize marijuana possession

The first part of the Sensible Policing Act is an amendment to the BC Police Act, which redirects all police in the province from using any police resources, including member time, on investigations, searches, seizures, citations, arrests or detentions related solely to simple possession of cannabis.

This section applies to all police in the province, essentially decriminalizing the simple possession of cannabis in BC. It doesn’t impact on any of the laws around trafficking, possession for the purposes of trafficking, or cultivation.

To deal with minors, the Sensible Policing Act also adds cannabis to the section of the BC Liquor Control Act which covers minors in possession of alcohol. This will enable a police officer to confiscate cannabis from a minor, in exactly the same manner and with the same penalties as for alcohol.

PART TWO: Work towards legal regulation

The second part of the Sensible Policing Act formally calls upon the federal government to repeal cannabis prohibition by removing cannabis from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, or to give British Columbia a “Section 56” exemption, so that our province can start legally taxing and regulating cannabis, using lessons learned from alcohol and tobacco.

This section also mandates the provincial government to launch a public commission, which will hold hearings to study and recommend the specific rules needed for the province to implement a legally regulated cannabis system once the federal government allows it.

 

B.C. political parties respond to call for support of legalized marijuana trial

Posted on by

Four major political parties differ on backing of research study despite poll demonstrating overwhelming public support in favour

Related materials: Overview of party responses, full text of party responses, original questionnaire, polling data, FAQs, PDF of press release

Vancouver, BC [May 3, 2013] — Three of B.C.’s major political parties have responded to a questionnaire asking whether they would oppose a small-scale research trial to evaluate the taxation and regulation of adult cannabis use.

The questionnaire was issued by Stop the Violence BC (STVBC), a coalition of law enforcement officials, legal experts, public health officials and academic experts advocating for a research trial to investigate whether the taxation and strict regulation of adult marijuana use could reduce profits to organized crime and better prevent youth access to the drug.

When asked whether they would prevent a federally and ethically approved study of this nature, both the BC NDP and the Green Party of BC indicated their support of the evaluation, while the BC Liberals responded that a research trial would have to be initiated by the federal government and only then would they give the proposal “serious consideration.” The BC Conservatives chose not respond to the questionnaire.

“It’s encouraging to see leading political parties are open to investigating alternatives to cannabis prohibition,” said Randie Long, a member of STVBC and former Federal Prosecutor. “As a federal prosecutor who has witnessed the ineffectiveness and serious harms resulting from the criminal justice approach to cannabis control, I believe politicians across jurisdictions should be actively searching for alternatives.”

The questionnaire was sent to the parties on April 18 following the release of an Angus Reid poll showing that British Columbians overwhelmingly support the province undertaking a pilot study to evaluate the taxation and regulation of adult cannabis use. The survey, conducted between April 8 and 9, found that 73 per cent of British Columbians support a B.C. research trial conducted by local experts and health scientists.

“To suggest the federal government would have to initiate a research trial is a completely inaccurate statement,” said Kash Heed, a longtime law enforcement official and former MLA for Vancouver-Fraserview in reference to the Liberal Party’s response. “Some of our political leaders continue to bury their heads in the sand instead of taking decisive leadership. With all the grow ops and prohibition-related violence that is ongoing in B.C. communities, provincial politicians cannot continue to bury their heads in the sand and pass the buck to the federal government.”

In response to applications from B.C. researchers, the federal government has recently provided research exemptions that allow British Columbian studies on the impacts of heroin prescription in the Downtown Eastside, as well as a trial of prescription MDMA (ecstasy) for post-traumatic stress disorder.

“Given the enormous costs and unintended consequences of cannabis prohibition, all political leaders should be endorsing carefully controlled assessments of alternative approaches,” said Dr. Evan Wood, founder of STVBC and Canadian Research Chair in Inner City Medicine at UBC. “For too long cannabis prohibition has endangered public health and safety by allowing organized criminals to control the industry. Especially now that Washington State has moved to tax and regulate adult cannabis use, B.C. must begin to research these types of alternatives.”

The proposed research trial is presently being designed, and initial proposals suggest it could operate with the objectives of improving community health and safety by: reducing unsafe and illegal grow ops through sanctioned cannabis producers, redirecting organized crime profits to fund addiction treatment and other underfunded health and social programs, and carefully assess for potential negative consequences for trial participants and the local community.

For a full listing of coalition members and to learn more about the coalition, please visit www.stoptheviolencebc.org

For more information about Stop the Violence BC or to interview a coalition member, please contact:

Bridgitte Anderson
c. 604.761.8048
e. bridgitte.anderson@edelman.com

 

Majority Supports Study to Evaluate Taxation and Regulation of Marijuana

Posted on by

New poll shows 73 per cent support research trial to evaluate whether taxation and regulation of marijuana could reduce profits to organized crime; questionnaire sent to B.C. political parties


Vancouver, BC [April 18, 2013] — A new Angus Reid poll released today shows that British Columbians overwhelmingly support the province undertaking a pilot study to evaluate the taxation and regulation of adult cannabis use.

The survey, conducted between April 8 and 9, found that 73 per cent of British Columbians support a B.C. research trial conducted by local experts and health scientists to evaluate whether the taxation and strict regulation of adult marijuana use could reduce profits to organized crime and better prevent youth access to the drug.

Downloads: poll results, questionnaire, frequently asked questions, media release [PDF]

Furthermore, 44 per cent of British Columbians say their perception of a provincial political party would improve if they supported a trial of this nature, compared to 33 per cent who say their opinion would be unchanged and just 12 per cent who said their opinion would worsen.

“These results clearly indicate British Columbians, regardless of their political affiliation, would welcome researching a new approach to marijuana policy involving the taxation and regulation of adult use,” said Mario Canseco, Vice President, Angus Reid Public Opinion. “Consistently our polling results are showing the public is demanding a new approach and turning away from strategies like mandatory minimum sentences for marijuana offenses.”

Stop the Violence BC (STVBC) has issued an Election 2013 questionnaire to B.C.’s four major political parties in advance of the May 14th election asking whether they would support a research trial of cannabis regulation.

“British Columbians clearly want their politicians to show leadership on marijuana policy reform,” said Geoff Plant, who served as B.C. attorney general from 2001 to 2005 under the BC Liberals. “With the province facing an election in a few weeks, now is the time for all political parties to let the public know whether they will support the proposed research trial of cannabis taxation and regulation.”

An Angus Reid poll from November 2012 showed 75 per cent support for the taxation and regulation of marijuana, and voters in both Washington State and Colorado recently passed initiatives to tax and regulate the adult use of marijuana.

“What we’ve witnessed in Washington State is the public no longer tolerating poorly conceived laws and rejecting marijuana prohibition as an enormous failure in the United States,” said John McKay, the former U.S. attorney for the Western District of Washington State. “British Columbia has an opportunity to join Washington State and show the world, criminal prohibition is a costly failure and public health and safety will be better served by legalization, strict regulation and capturing, through taxation, the profits we’ve handed over to the drug cartels and thugs for decades.”

STVBC is advocating for a research group to develop and coordinate an ethically approved research trial to assess the impacts of a government-sanctioned cannabis retail establishment for adult recreational cannabis users. Such a trial could legally operate under a Section 56 exemption of the federal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and would assess impacts on users and the local community as well as estimate operation costs and potential tax revenue. The federal government has recently provided Section 56 exemptions to assess the impacts of heroin prescription in the Downtown Eastside as well as a trial of prescription MDMA (ecstasy) for post-traumatic stress disorder.

“Our politicians have been out of step with public opinion on this issue for too long,” said Ujjal Dosanjh, former New Democratic premier of B.C. “With the support of nearly three-quarters of British Columbians on the one hand, and prohibition-related violence and criminal activity across B.C. on the other, our provincial leaders have to support researching alternatives.”

The proposed research trial is presently being designed, and initial proposals suggest it could operate with the objectives of improving community health and safety by: reducing unsafe and illegal grow ops through sanctioned safe cannabis producers, redirecting organized crime profits to fund addiction treatment and other underfunded health and social programs, and assess for potential negative consequences for trial participants and the local community.

– 30 –

About Stop the Violence BC

Stop the Violence BC is a coalition of law enforcement officials, legal experts, public health officials and academic experts from the University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, University of Victoria and the University of Northern BC. Coalition members have come together to engage all British Columbians in a discussion aimed at developing and implementing marijuana-related policies that improve public health while reducing social harms, including violent crime.

For more information about Stop the Violence BC or to interview a coalition member, please contact:

Kevin Hollett
Phone: 604-682-2344 ext. 66536
Mobile: 778-848-3420
khollett@cfenet.ubc.ca

New poll shows 73% support research trial to evaluate cannabis regulation

Posted on by

A new Angus Reid poll shows that British Columbians overwhelmingly support the province undertaking a pilot study to evaluate the taxation and regulation of adult cannabis use.

The survey, conducted between April 8 and 9, found that 73 per cent of British Columbians support a B.C. research trial conducted by local experts and health scientists to evaluate whether the taxation and strict regulation of adult marijuana use could reduce profits to organized crime and better prevent youth access to the drug.

Furthermore, 44 per cent of British Columbians say their perception of a provincial political party would improve if they supported a trial of this nature, compared to 33 per cent who say their opinion would be unchanged and just 12 per cent who said their opinion would worsen.

“These results clearly indicate British Columbians, regardless of their political affiliation, would welcome researching a new approach to marijuana policy involving the taxation and regulation of adult use,” said Mario Canseco, Vice President, Angus Reid Public Opinion. “Consistently our polling results are showing the public is demanding a new approach and turning away from strategies like mandatory minimum sentences for marijuana offenses.”

Stop the Violence BC (STVBC) has issued an Election 2013 questionnaire to B.C.’s four major political parties in advance of the May 14th election asking whether they would support a research trial of cannabis regulation.

To download a copy of the poll results, click here. For information about the poll or proposed research study, click here.

Leading authority on drug policy and the war on drugs to speak at Munk School of Global Affairs

Posted on by

Ethan Nadelmann Available for Interviews: Topics Include Marijuana Legalization Victories in CO and WA, Growing Debate in Latin America on Alternatives to Drug War and Drug Policy Issues in Canada

March 12, 2013 (Toronto, Canada) – Ethan Nadelmann will be featured at the Centre for Study of the United States at the Munk School giving a talk entitled, “The Rise and Fall of the Global Drug Prohibition Regime.”

Ethan Nadelmann will address issues specific to Canada, as well as international matters such as:

  • Current debate on drug legalization in Latin America
  • Marijuana legalization in Colorado and Washington
  • Drug policy and the Obama Administration

Described by Rolling Stone as “the point man” for drug policy reform efforts, Ethan Nadelmann is widely regarded as the outstanding proponent of drug policy reform both in the United States and abroad. Ethan Nadelmann is the founder and executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, the leading organization in the United States promoting alternatives to the war on drugs. Nadelmann received his B.A., J.D., and Ph.D. in Political Science from Harvard as well as a Masters’ degree in International Relations from the London School of Economics, and taught at Princeton University for seven years. His writings have appeared in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal,Science, and National Review, and he has appeared on programs including Real Time with Bill Maher, the Colbert Report, ABC’s Nightline, a Ted Koppel Special Report, NBC’s Today Show, NBC Nightly News, CBS’s 48 Hours, CBS Morning News, and Larry King Live.

The lecture is organized by Centre for Study of the United States at the Munk School of Global Affairs, and the Department for the Study of Religion, University of Toronto.

EVENT DETAILS:

WHO/WHAT: Ethan Nadelmann: The Rise and Fall of the Global Drug Prohibition Regime, part of the CSUS and F.Ross Johnson Speaker Series
WHERE: Munk School of Global Affairs, Room 208N http://munkschool.utoronto.ca/event/13536/WHEN: Tuesday, March 19, 2013, 5:00pm – 7:00pm

On Wednesday, March 20, at 3:00pm, Ethan Nadelmann will also participate in a University of Toronto public forum titled, “Whose conviction? Religion and the (De)criminalization of Drugs.” http://rps.chass.utoronto.ca/doc/RPS-Drugs-Forum-Workshop-web.pdf

ABOUT THE CENTRE FOR STUDY OF THE UNITED STATES: Housed in the Munk School of Global Affairs, the Centre for the Study of the United States (CSUS) represents the largest collection of U.S.-focused scholars in Canada, as well as the greatest concentration of U.S. expertise in Canada’s history. Drawing on the resources of the Munk School, and with over 66 faculty affiliates, it has an unprecedented strength in U.S. expertise and in American Studies, both institutionally and nationally. For more information about CSUS and the Munk School of Global Affairs please visit:www.munkschool.utoronto.ca.

-30-

Contact:
Kevin O’Neill (416.978.7050) kevin.oneill@utoronto.ca
Tony Newman (646.335.5384) tnewman@drugpolicy.org

Local groups rally in support of the “most important drug war film you will ever see”

Posted on by

2012 Sundance Film Festival Winner debuts in Vancouver this Friday, welcomed by Vancouver academic, advocacy, and business groups

Vancouver B.C. [February 28] – Organizations across the city are encouraging the public to attend limited screenings of The House I Live In, a U.S. documentary that has been heralded as “the definitive film on the failure of America’s drug war” and “a masterpiece filled with hope and the potential to effect change” showing this month at VanCity Theatre.

Filmed in more than 20 states across America, The House I Live In describes the consequences of America’s “war on drugs”. From the dealer to the grieving mother, the narcotics officer to the senator, the inmate to the federal judge, the film covers every angle of America’s longest war – and rings a warning bell for countries like Canada that are following in the footsteps of the U.S.’s failed “tough-on-crime” approach to drug policy.

Groups across Vancouver – including past and present members of law enforcement, internationally renowned researchers, health care organizations, student coalitions and members of the business community – are voicing their support for the film and encouraging attendance at the five screenings between Friday, March 1 and Wednesday, March 12.

This release is circulated by Stop the Violence BC on behalf of the following organizations that have publicly endorsed the film:

  • Urban Health Research Initiative (www.uhri.cfenet.ubc.ca)
  • Positive Women’s Network (www.pwn.bc.ca)
  • Law Enforcement Against Prohibition – Canada (www.leap.cc)
  • Canadian Students for Sensible Drug Policy – Vancouver (www.cssdp.org)
  • St. Paul’s Hospital Foundation (www.helpstpauls.com)
  • Megaphone Magazine (www.megaphonemagazine.ca)
  • Providence Health Care (www.providencehealthcare.org)
  • Collaborating Centre for Prison Health and Education
  • Canadian Drug Policy Coalition (www.drugpolicy.ca)(www.ccphe.familymed.ubc.ca)
  • The Media Merchants (www.themediamerchants.ca)
  • Stop the Violence BC (www.stoptheviolencebc.org)
  • BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS (www.cfenet.ubc.ca)

To view a trailer for The House I Live In, click here.

For a list of screenings, click here.

Why local organizations are encouraging people to see this film:

“After viewing the film, I was immersed in the care of addicted individuals admitted to St. Paul’s Hospital and I have not been able to shake the feeling that I should spend some energy trying to have the film seen by influential people locally. I think it has real potential to engage people who have not well understood some of the work we, as publicly funded researchers and healthcare providers, are collectively doing.”

– Dr. Evan Wood, Professor of Medicine at UBC & Canada Research Chair in Inner City Medicine

“The drug war is a long-term battle that isn’t close to being “won” by anyone, yet has far-reaching negative effects. The House I Live In promises to be a film that considers the battles around drugs that go beyond drugs themselves- poverty, racism, literacy, gender inequities and other social determinants of health. We are excited to see this film come to Vancouver.”

– Janet Madsen, Communications Coordinator, BC Positive Women’s Network

“It is important for all Canadians to watch this film and understand the damage that the United States has suffered as a result of the war on drugs, mandatory minimum sentences, and similar policies. This is not the right path for our country.”

– C. Ross Lander, Ret. BC Supreme Court Justice & Member, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition – Canada

“The war on drugs has disproportionately affected low-income people. I hope this important documentary is seen by policymakers who are in a position to end this failed policy.”

– Sean Condon, Executive Director, Megaphone Magazine

“At St. Paul’s Hospital, I’ve seen the role that the treatment of addictions can play in solving the medical and social issues that face our most vulnerable populations. We encourage everyone to watch documentaries like ‘The House I Live In’ to learn about the scope of the illicit drug problem – and the need to address it.”

– Dick Vollet, President and CEO, St. Paul’s Hospital Foundation

“Everyone should watch ‘The House I Live In’ to gain an understanding of how the War on Drugs negatively impacts our personal lives and society as a whole. The “War on Drugs” is a war on people.”

– Tera Holmes, Canadian Students for Sensible Drug Policy – Vancouver

“At its essence, ‘The House I Live In’ is about social justice. It makes a compelling case for society – and for each of us – to act justly and collectively; for each of us to take action toward overcoming inequities in our legal, political and social systems that disadvantage and punish the most marginalized people. As the leader of a health care organization that has a values-based approach to providing compassionate and socially just care, to me ‘The House I Live In’ reinforces the notion that we should all rightly be judged by how well we care for the most vulnerable members of our society.”

– Dianne Doyle, President and CEO, St. Paul’s Hospital/Providence Health Care

“The House I Live In is an extremely relevant film in a time when mass incarceration has become the norm in many countries, including the USA. Not only does the “War on Drugs” result in higher incarceration rates, it also contributes to the transmission of HIV and Hep C because of a lack of community-equivalent harm reduction programs inside prisons. While this film highlights the impact of the decades-long war on African American and Hispanic communities in the US, it is important to note that similar inequities exist in Canada, where the burden of incarceration is disproportionately shouldered by Aboriginal communities.”

– Dr. Ruth Elwood Martin, Clinical Professor UBC Department of Family Practice & Chair, College of Family Physicians of Canada’s Prison Health SIFP

“If you want to understand the tragic impact that the war on drugs and policies such as mandatory minimum sentences (which Canada is now implementing) have had in destroying individuals, families and communities in the United States, this film is instructive. Canada needs to join those countries that are calling for an end to this destructive war.”

– Donald MacPherson, Director, Canadian Drug Policy Coalition

-30-

Media: To interview the above quoted, please contact:

Dr. Evan Wood, Professor of Medicine at UBC &
Canada Research Chair in Inner City Medicine
khollett@cfenet.ubc.ca; 604-682-2344 ext. 66520

Janet Madsen, Communications Coordinator, BC Positive Women’s Network
JanetM@pwn.bc.ca; 604-692-3009

C. Ross Lander, Ret. Supreme Court Justice & Member
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition – Canada
khollett@cfenet.ubc.ca; 604-682-2344 ext. 66520

Sean Condon, Executive Director, Megaphone Magazine
sean@megaphonemagazine.com; 604-345-7227

Dick Vollet, President and CEO, St. Paul’s Hospital Foundation
BDare@providencehealth.bc.ca; 604-806-9850

Tera Holmes, Canadian Students for Sensible Drug Policy – Vancouver
cssdpvancouver@gmail.com

Dianne Doyle, President and CEO, St. Paul’s Hospital/Providence Health Care
shussain@providencehealth.bc.ca; 604.806.8566

Dr. Ruth Elwood Martin, Clinical Professor, UBC Department of Family Practice &
Chair, College of Family Physicians of Canada’s Prison Health SIFP
ruth.martin@familymed.ubc.ca; 604-822-2496

Donald MacPherson, Director, Canadian Drug Policy Coalition
dhaddow@drugpolicy.ca; 778-388-3457

About Stop the Violence BC
Stop the Violence BC is a coalition of law enforcement officials, legal experts, public health officials and academic experts from the University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, University of Victoria, and the University of Northern BC. Coalition members have come together to engage all British Columbians in a discussion aimed at developing and implementing marijuana-related policies that improve public health while reducing social harms, including violent crime.

For a full listing of coalition members and to learn more about the coalition, please visit www.stoptheviolencebc.org.

Media: for more information, please contact:

Kevin Hollett
Phone: 604-682-2344 ext. 66536
Mobile: 778-848-3420
khollett@cfenet.ubc.ca

Coalition members invited to present to District of North Vancouver Council

Posted on by

The District of North Vancouver Council has invited a number of Stop the Violence BC Coalition members to present to council and the public regarding implications of cannabis policy reform on Thursday, March 7th, 2013 at 6:30pm.

Cannabis regulation and our communities: A look at what policy reform means for BC

From Mayor Richard Walton: All British Columbia communities have been concerned about the community health and safety consequences resulting from the illegal cannabis industry. Various levels of government, including at the municipal level, have made successive investments in enforcing anti-cannabis laws and yet illegal grow operations have continued to proliferate and studies suggest young people have easier access to cannabis than alcohol and cigarettes. Recently, there have been high-level calls from legal, law enforcement and public health experts that alternative approaches may better protect community health and safety.

In light of these on-going discussions, a recent Union of BC Municipalities call to cannabis policy reform, and two successful legalization initiatives in the United States in 2012, Mayor Richard Walton and Councillor Lisa Muri invite you to attend a public panel discussion regarding the illegal cannabis industry in British Columbia and why many experts are calling for a new approach.

As public servants and citizens we are united in our concern for public health and safety in the region and across the province. We hope you will join us in considering options for how we may address these issues as they relate to cannabis policy on Thursday, March 7th at 6:30pm in the District of North Vancouver Council Chambers.

Speakers include: 

  • Professor Werner Antweiller, Associate Professor at the University of British Columbia Sauder School of Business
  • Hon. Kash Heed, Member of the Legislative Assembly of B.C. and long-time law enforcement official
  • Geoff Plant Q.C., lawyer and former Attorney-General of B.C.
  • Dr. Evan Wood, Professor of Medicine and Canadian Research Chair in Inner City Medicine  at the University of British Columbia

Time, date, and location:

When: Thursday March 7, 2013 at 6:30pm
Where:  District of North Vancouver Council Chambers, 355 West Queens Road

To attend:

To RSVP, please contact Cristina Rucci, Social Planner, at crucci@dnv.org or by phone at 604-990-2274 by February 28, 2013.

Examining driving under the influence: New study makes recommendations for a ‘drugged driving’ policy

Posted on by

Following the passing of ballot measures to regulate cannabis sales and consumption in Washington and Colorado this past November, many wondered what a regulatory system could and would look like.

While the ballot measures outlined where tax revenues would be directed (including drug treatment and education programs), questions remain on what the social impacts of legalized cannabis might be on other health and social indicators.

A new study published in Drug Testing and Analysis addresses one of these primary issues: driving under the influence of cannabis. (See: Armentano, P. (2013), Cannabis and psychomotor performance: A rational review of the evidence and implications for public policy. Drug Test Analysis, 5: 52–56. doi: 10.1002/dta.1404)

Study author Paul Armentano is the deputy director of National Organization for the Reform of Cannabis Laws (NORML). Founded in 1970, NORML has played a central role in the cannabis legalization movement, operating a large grassroots network with 135 chapters and over 550 lawyers internationally, and Armentano is widely regarded as an expert in the field of marijuana policy, health, and pharmacology.

Armentano opens his paper by asking: “How does society address the public’s growing concerns about cannabis consumption and driving?”

Using data compiled in the US-based Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Association 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, Armentano found that 10.6 million Americans, or 4.2% of the population age 12 or older, reported driving under the influence of an illicit drug during the past year. He also cites another survey by the association that estimated that among those who acknowledge having driven following the consumption of an illicit substance, a majority of respondents, 70%, confirmed having done so following the ingestion of cannabis.

While this number is far from negligible, Armentano points out that it is far fewer than the number of respondents who acknowledge having driven while under the influence of alcohol.

While it is well established that alcohol consumption increases accident risk, Armentano presents evidence that cannabis’s role in increasing the risk of on-road driving accidents and injury is far less clear. What is clear, he finds, is that cannabis does impair cognitive and psychomotor performance. Put simply, driving under the influence of cannabis can be dangerous.

As a result, Armentano comes to a decisive conclusion: motorists should never operate a vehicle while after inhaling cannabis.

Among the other key findings from the study:

  • Less experienced drivers are more likely to be negatively affected by the consumption of cannabis
  • Less experienced cannabis consumers are also less tolerant of cannabis’ effects and also more likely to be impaired as a result
  • Cannabis’ influence on driving skills is arguably less severe than that induced by the consumption of alcohol, including relatively low doses of alcohol
  • Simultaneous use of both cannabis and alcohol further compounds the risk of accident

Armentano suggests that public education campaigns directed at young adult drivers (those aged 18-25) to warn them of the harms of driving under the influence of cannabis are particularly important, given that demographic’s inexperience with driving and their increased level of cannabis use relative to the general population.

In addition, Armentano makes clear recommendations for increasing law enforcement efforts to address cannabis-influenced driving, which include encouraging police officers to engage in drug recognition expert training and increasing the number of field sobriety tests, both of which would help police officers identify drivers who may be operating a vehicle while under the influence of cannabis.

Armentano also recommends the provisional use of point-of-collection cannabis-sensitive technology, such as a roadside saliva test, to rapidly identify the presence of THC in drivers.

Past research has demonstrated that the legalization and regulation of adult cannabis use will likely improve community health and safety and reduce many of the social harms associated with cannabis prohibition. Creating clear drugged driving policy is one important piece in ensuring that a regulatory system effectively minimizes the societal harms of cannabis use.

Media: to speak with a member of the Stop the Violence BC Coalition, please contact:

Kevin Hollett
BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS
604 682 2344 ext. 66536
khollett@cfenet.ubc.ca

Liberal Leadership Candidate Calls for Regulation and Taxation of Marijuana

Posted on by

George Takach joins Stop the Violence BC

Vancouver, BC [January 14, 2013] — Liberal Party leadership candidate George Takach today called for the regulation and taxation of cannabis for adults to reduce related organized crime activity and make our communities safer.

“I commend Mr. Takach for urging change to a policy that has failed to protect the health and safety of our communities,” said Dr. Evan Wood, founder of Stop the Violence BC and Canada Research Chair in Inner City Medicine at UBC. “It is time for all politicians, regardless of party, or level of government to recognize that marijuana prohibition has been a failure.”

Recently, Washington and Colorado approved the legalization of cannabis for adult use under a strictly regulated system. In November, Stop the Violence BC (STVBC) released an Angus Reid poll showing 75% support taxation and regulation of cannabis.

“It is clear the public supports ending cannabis prohibition,” said Neil Boyd, Professor, School of Criminology at Simon Fraser University. “Canada’s marijuana laws fuel gang violence, organized crime and easy access to cannabis for youth.”

At a news conference today, Takach announced he is joining Stop the Violence BC (STVBC), a coalition of academic, legal, law enforcement and health experts, and its campaign to reform cannabis laws to reduce the harms associated with the illegal cannabis trade, including gang violence. He joins a growing list of endorsements that includes a coalition of B.C. mayors, the Health Officers Council of B.C., four former mayors of Vancouver and former B.C. attorneys general.

– 30 –

About Stop the Violence BC

Stop the Violence BC is a coalition of law enforcement officials, legal experts, public health officials and academic experts from the University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, University of Victoria and the University of Northern BC. Coalition members have come together to engage all British Columbians in a discussion aimed at developing and implementing marijuana-related policies that improve public health while reducing social harms, including violent crime.

For a full listing of coalition members and to learn more about the coalition, please click here.

For more information about Stop the Violence BC or to interview a coalition member, please contact:

Kevin Hollett

604 682 2344 ext 66536
khollett@cfenet.ubc.ca

Poll: British Columbians support regulation, ready for change

Posted on by

This poll illustrates British Columbians overwhelming support for moving away from cannabis prohibition toward a system of regulation and taxation, and that lawmakers continue to lag far behind public opinion on revamping cannabis laws in B.C.

Click here for the raw data or click here for the graphs.

The survey, conducted between October 22 and 24, found that 75% of B.C. respondents support the taxation and regulation of cannabis over chasing and arresting cannabis producers and sellers, a jump of six percentage points from just one year ago.

“These results reveal a quite remarkable and growing dissatisfaction among British Columbians with the status quo and an eagerness for policymakers to pursue an entirely new approach to cannabis policy,” said Mario Canseco, Vice President, Angus Reid Public Opinion. “These beliefs cut across political, social and regional lines. I can’t think of any other issue where the laws on the books are inconsistent with the wishes of three-quarters of British Columbians.”

The poll results come a year after a similar Angus Reid survey, and demonstrate increasing public opinion that cannabis prohibition in B.C. has been ineffective and caused significant social harms and public safety issues, such as increased organized crime, gang violence and illegal marijuana grow ops.

Key Angus Reid poll data:

  • Only 14% of British Columbians believe possession of a marijuana cigarette should lead to a criminal record, down from 20% one year ago
  • 75% support the taxation and regulation of cannabis over chasing and arresting cannabis producers and sellers, an increase of six percentage points from 2011
  • 74% would be comfortable living in a society where adult cannabis consumption was taxed and legally regulated under a public health framework, an increase of four percentage points from last year
  • At 62%, fewer BC residents support decriminalizing marijuana use than the proportion that support outright taxation and regulation

The poll surveyed 799 respondents in B.C. The results have a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

“From a scientific and public safety, making cannabis illegal has clearly been an expensive and harmful failure,” said Dr. Evan Wood, founder of Stop the Violence BC and Canada Research Chair in Inner City Medicine at UBC. “With 75% of British Columbians supporting change, and the status quo contributing to increasing harms in BC communities, it is absolutely time for politicians to catch up with the public.”